Tag Archives: web-browsing

Run Your Own Free Proxy Through the Google App Engine [Proxy]

Finding a good proxy is difficult. You either have to run it yourself from your home computer or web server, or you're left scavenging about for free proxies online. Instead, you can run one for free through the Google App Engine. If you want total control over your proxy experience, you can always run a home proxy. We showed you how to set one up last month with our guide to bypassing heavy-handed firewalls . While you're tinkering away with your home network it's also worth setting up a SSH SOCKS proxy to encrypt and secure all your remote traffic too. If you don't want to leave your computer on all the time or be limited by the speed of your home internet connection however, you can use a Google account to set up a proxy server that runs off the Google Apps Engine and allows you to browse via proxy independent of your home network and without having to trust a sketchy third-party proxy. You'll be running your own proxy server through the Apps Engine, free for you to tweak. They've put together a detailed guide at Digital Inspiration, check out the video below: For step by step instructions, including lots of screen shots, visit the link below. Have your own way for circumventing firewalls and browsing on your own terms Let's hear about it in the comments. How-To Setup Your Own Web Proxy Server for Free with Google Apps Engine [Digital Inspiration]
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fact and Fiction: The Truth About Browser Cookies [Privacy]

Browser cookies are one of those technical bits of web browsing that almost everyone has some awareness of. They're also probably one of the most misunderstood aspects of browsing. Today we're here to clear up the confusion. Photo by esti . When it comes to browser cookies, most users have a lot of misconceptions about what they do. Here's a closer look at exactly what a browser cookie is, what it isn't, and what it's really used for. Note: If you're serious about your online privacy, check out our guide on how to really browse without leaving a trace , where we cover much more than just cookies. What Are Cookies Anyway? Cookies are nothing more than tiny bits of text stored on your PC by your web browser, containing information set by web sites such as your session token, user preferences, or anything else that the web site needs to keep track of you from one request to the next. Once the web site has asked your browser to set the cookie, the next time your browser opens a new request to the server—clicking a link to a page, adding an item to your cart, or even loading an image—your browser will send that cookie back to the web site that set the cookie. Cookies exist because the underlying HTTP protocol is stateless—each request from your browser is completely separate from the next one, so the server needs a way to keep track of what request belongs to what visitor. By storing a small bit of information in a cookie, the web site can determine that your page view belongs to your user account. There are two "categories" of cookies: either first-party or third-party cookies. (Although there's actually no technical difference between the two.) First-party cookies are those cookies that belong to sites you actually visited in your browser, while third-party cookies, also known as tracking cookies, are generated from a Javascript include on the page—generally from third-party advertising web sites. Myth: Cookies Spy On You and Track Everything You Are Doing As we've already learned, the contents of cookies are set by the web site that you visited, so unless you've given your information to a web site, there's no way that cookies are going to contain personal information unless you've given that information to the site already. Most cookies are as simple as a session token, but sometimes they contain your login credentials, usually encrypted or hashed in some format—but since cookies are only sent back to the same site that originated them, even if cookies contained personal information, it is not going to be shared with every site you visit. Myth: Cookies Are Viruses or Spyware and Create Spam and Popups Cookies are nothing more than text files and could not be executed even if you track down the hidden folder they are usually located in, but a surprising amount of people believe that cookies contain viruses or spyware. The reason for this, other than misconceptions fueled by clueless TV writers, is probably because most anti-spyware applications catch tracking cookies when you do a scan. Why? Cookies can be used by advertising web sites to track the sites you visit (assuming the sites are using the same advertising network—see more below), so most anti-spyware applications help you remove them. The other myth is that cookies are responsible for spam and create pop-up advertisements. While it's true that an advertiser can use cookies to track which pop-up ads you've seen, the cookies have nothing to do with the advertisement in the first place. Fact: Spyware and Viruses Can Read Your Cookies, but So What? Another common misconception is that cookies are bad because if you have a virus or spyware infection, they can read your cookies to find out more information about you. This concept is not only overly paranoid, but completely illogical to boot—if your PC is already infected with a virus, you've got a lot more to worry about than a virus "reading" your cookies, since it has complete control over your computer, and your information at that point. You're better off spending your energy learning about the best ways to keep your PC secure . Fact: Cookies Are Required for Logging Into Most Sites The vast majority of web sites require cookies to be enabled in order to create an account and keep yourself logged in, so if you disable cookies in your browser, a large portion of the web is going to be broken. There are some exceptions, of course—you'll probably notice that many shopping web sites embed the session token into the URL, but it's not something that most sites are going to implement. These cookies are considered first-party cookies, because they are set by the web site you purposely visited. Fact: Cookies are Used by Advertisers to Track Sites You Visit Because cookies are always sent back to the site that originated them, an advertiser's cookie will be sent back to them from every web site you visit that is also using that same advertiser. This allows the advertiser to track the sites you visit, and send targeted advertising based on the types of sites that you visit. This does not mean that advertisers can read the cookies from the web site you are visiting—they can only read their own cookies, but because the advertising Javascript is embedded in the page, they will know the URL you are visiting. These cookies are considered third-party cookies, because they are not set by the actual page you are visiting, and they can generally be blocked without causing any serious problems. If this type of tracking keeps you up at night, consider that an advertiser can already track the sites you visit based a combination of your IP address, browser version, location, and any number of other factors—so getting rid of the tracking cookies only eliminates a small piece of the puzzle when it comes to tracking your behavior online. There are also only a few advertisers big enough to really track you across the majority of web sites—and one has to assume Google already knows everything else you're doing online. Fact: Deleting or Blocking Cookies Can Cause More Annoying Ads If you've ever visited a web site that sometimes, but not always, prevents you from reading the article until you click through an interstitial advertisement that takes over the entire page—you might wonder what logic dictates who sees the ads and when. Here's how it works: interstitial ads pay web sites very lucrative rates to allow them to take over the entire page, but since most web site owners know that they are annoying, they are usually rate-limited so they aren't seen too often by the same person. Once you've seen the ad a single time, the advertiser sets a cookie on your PC to make certain that you don't see the same annoying ad again for a while. If you are deleting your cookies on a regular basis, you're probably also seeing a lot more of these interstitial ads than everybody else. That is, of course, if you don't have an adblocker installed. Fact: Disabling Cookies Doesn't Matter If You Have Flash Enabled As we've already pointed out in our guide to browsing without leaving a trace , even if you are blocking cookies in your browser, advertisers are using Flash cookies to keep track of what you're browsing online. In fact, more than half of the most popular web sites are using Flash tracking cookies—and even using your browser in private mode won't (currently) stop them from tracking you this way. Still Want to Block Cookies? Try Blocking Third Party Cookies Only If you are still worried about cookies for privacy reasons, you can set up your browser to only accept first-party cookies, so you'll still be able to login to all the web sites that you visit. For Firefox, just head into the Options panel, switch to the Privacy tab, and uncheck the Accept third-party cookies box. If that causes you any problems, you can keep the option checked, but change the "Keep until" setting to remove the cookies once you close Firefox. Other browsers have similar settings; just head into the options to find them. Do you clear your cookies religiously, or do you just use a private browsing mode? Share your thoughts in the comments. The How-To Geek isn't paranoid enough to delete cookies regularly. His geeky articles can be found daily here on Lifehacker, How-To Geek , and Twitter .
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Enable Firefox’s Secret Mousewheel Scrolling Acceleration [Firefox Tips]

Windows only: If you are accustomed to scrolling quickly through long documents, there's a secret Firefox 3.6 config setting that allows you to enable acceleration, which will scroll more quickly based on how many times you've scrolled. To tweak the acceleration for yourself, head into Firefox's about:config page, and then filter by mousewheel.acceleration to find the two settings that apply—the mousewheel.acceleration.start setting actually enables acceleration by setting the number of times you need to scroll your mouse before the acceleration kicks in, while the mousewheel.acceleration.factor setting specifies how much acceleration to apply. The new mouse wheel acceleration feature is disabled by default in Firefox 3.6 because it can conflict with your mouse drivers, especially if you've enabled faster scrolling in the Mouse panel in Control Panel, but you can tweak the setting either way. It's not a setting that everybody will want to apply, but if you're unhappy with the current Firefox scrolling, you can play around with the settings to figure out your preferred level of acceleration. It only works in Firefox 3.6 on Windows, and make sure to hit the link for a full explanation on how it works. Faster! Accelerate Firefox 3.6 page scrolling [Mozilla Links via Life Rocks 2.0 ]
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Browser Speed Tests: Firefox 3.6, Chrome 4, Opera 10.5, and Extensions [Performance Tests]

Firefox 3.6 is out, Chrome's stable version got a big upgrade, and Opera 10.5 is inching toward release. It's a great time for us to break out the timer, process manager, and code tracker for some up-to-date browser speed tests. This go-round, we did things just slightly different from our last batch of browser tests . We're still timing the human experience of clicking to start a browser and waiting for it to reach a (locally saved) home page, both "cold" (right after boot-up) and "warm" (after running at least once already), and having it load nine tabs at once, using a millisecond, keyboard-activated timer app from Rob Keir . To test JavaScript speeds and, new to these tests, DOM and CSS querying, we're using Mozilla's Dromaeo online suite, which loads offline and implements both Apple's SunSpider and Google's V8 tests, along with others. To measure memory use, we're using Windows 7's process manager, except in the case of Chrome, which has its own system . The tests are, as ever, performed on my trusty ThinkPad T61p, running a 2.0 GHz Intel Centrino Duo processor and sporting 2 GB of RAM, and currently running Windows 7. What's new this go-round is, as mentioned, the inclusion of Dromaeo's DOM/CSS tests, as the use of jQuery and other JavaScript-based code will be increasingly important as HTML5 starts changing the web game . We also ran a little side test involving extensions, as many readers (and, truth be told, editors here) have noted that Firefox runs tight on memory when it's brand new, but it's long-term extension use that seems to slow things down. So we loaded up Firefox 3.6, and both the "stable" and "development" versions of Chrome, with extensions found on both browsers: Xmarks bookmark sync AdBlock (known as AdBlock Plus on Firefox) CoolIris photo viewer Gmail-based mail checkers: Gmail checker for Firefox, Google Mail Checker for Chrome LastPass password manager Are these extensions exactly the same between Firefox and Chrome? Not really. Are they generally providing the same functionality? We hope so. Either way, we wanted to see what a fan of these five fairly popular extensions would experience, in terms of memory use, across all three browsers (for Windows) that have a robust extension platform. On to the tests! Update: Originally this post referred to Opera's 10.5 release as a beta, but it's actually still a pre-alpha release. We've updated the text; our apologies for the confusion. Click any of the images below for a clearer and wider look at the results. Boot-up and warm loading; Winner: Opera! Opera 10.01 and 10.5 Pre-Alpha are so close together in cold and warm starts, you could write off the difference to the speed of your testing editor's finger on the timer button. Close behind is Chrome's stable and development versions, similarly close in standing. Firefox 3.6 was surprisingly just a tad slower than 3.5 in starting up, at least from first boot-up, and Safari remains a fairly slow starter. Tab Loading; Winner: Chrome (Stable)! We were more than a little surprised at this result, so we triple-checked that we'd cleaned out Chrome's cache, cookies, and browsing data to ensure it wasn't getting a head start on loading each browser's home page, plus Gizmodo, Lifehacker, Hulu, and the Google home page. But the numbers bore out the new Chrome release's prowess on the "Open all in bookmarks" function, which bodes well for its individual tab loading: JavaScript; Winner: Opera 10.5 Pre-Alpha! (Somehow) Browser developers have told us before that JavaScript engine coders can, intentionally or subconsciously, write their frameworks "to the test," giving them an artificial advantage when placed against the competition in certain tests. And pure runs per second is, as Mozilla's Mike Beltzner put it, like a horsepower rating on a car—it doesn't tell the whole story of its performance. Still, to look at Opera 10.5 in the Dromaeo aggregate results, you'd think that either Opera has developers who have learned not to sleep, or that something funny is going on. Still, we have to call them the winner, with Chrome's development channel, stable release, and Safari 4 picking up the remaining winner's circle slots. DOM/CSS; Winner: Chrome (Dev)! Google's browser mostly walks away with this one. Safari puts in a strong showing, and Firefox pushes past Opera. Memory use, no extensions; Winner: Firefox 3.6! For all the emphasis Firefox put on its themes, security, and plugin management for the 3.6 release, they could have mentioned that it's even more efficient with memory, at least soon after start-up, than the already impressive 3.5 releases. Opera 10.01 and Safari 4 aren't far behind, Opera 10.5 shows a pretty hefty jump in tab holding, and if you're using Chrome with multiple tabs, you'd better have a pretty modern system. Memory use with extensions; Winner: Firefox 3.6! You know what we learned about Chrome in these tests? That there's a price to pay for its walled garden model of security. It seems like each extension is individually contained in a tab-like shell, meaning that if your extension crashes, it won't bring down your whole browser. Even if it does, your tab contents and writing are preserved. That said, to have those extensions loaded, with or without tabs open, makes pretty big difference in memory use. Extensions make a different in Firefox, too, but much more incrementally: The scores As we first implemented in our last tests , we took the numeric score placement of each browser in each category and ranked them from 7, as best in category, to 1, as worst. We totaled those numbers up, and present them here as a total out of 35. If a browser had a 35, it would be best in every category: startup, page loading, code handling, and memory use. We didn't include the extension memory test, because it's not a fair fight between all the browsers. Scores (out of 35 possible) Google Chrome 4.0.302.3 (dev): 25 Google Chrome 4.0.249.78 (stable): 24 Firefox 3.6: 20 Firefox 3.5.4: 21 Opera 10.5 Pre-Alpha: 25 Opera 10.01: 15 Safari 4.0.4: 19 What did we learn? If you're using Opera 10.01, you have almost no reason not to upgrade. If you're using Chrome, the Stable channel is pretty much a wash with the development version, barring any new features that make their way first to the dev channel (which, granted, some certainly will). Firefox 3.6 seems more of an upgrade in features than core components, and Safari, well, doesn't it have a really neat launch page? Like our results? Totally disagree? We want to hear about it in the comments. [Sponsored] NEC
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Private Browsing Window Adds Chrome-Like Incognito Windows to Firefox [Downloads]

Firefox: Sick of having to start a completely new session (and get rid of your old one) just for private browsing? Firefox extension Private Browsing Window starts your private session in a new window without closing old ones, like Chrome's Incognito Window. It's not quite as smooth as Chrome's Incognito Windows, but it works pretty well. Private Browsing Window essentially starts a new instance of Firefox alongside your existing session, with a new profile in which Private Browsing is enabled. You don't have all your old bookmarks or preferences in your new private window, but you don't have to end your non-private session, which is certainly convenient. This feature replaces the old Private Browsing feature in the Tools menu and adds a small shortcut in the bottom right corner of your screen. Note that this add-on requires the latest and greatest Firefox 3.6 to run, so if you haven't updated, what are you waiting for? Private Browsing Window is free and works wherever Firefox 3.6 does. Thanks, Jason! Private Browsing Window [Mozilla Add-Ons]
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

StayFocusd Blocks and Manages Time-Sucking Web Sites [Downloads]

Windows/Mac/Linux (Chrome): It's okay to fit a little social networking and not-quite-job-related news reading into your day, but mental limits are hard to stick to. StayFocusd sets timers on the sites you know are addictive, then blocks them when time's up. Rather than set individual time limits for each site, StayFocusd asks for a total amount of time you want to let yourself spend on all your non-productive sites. Kind of a clever restriction to have, because you just know you'd be heading right over to Twitter once your Facebook timer ran out, and vice-versa. StayFocusd does get specific on site URLs, though. You can timer-block the entirety of Reddit, for example, but leave the link submission section open for use throughout the day. StayFocusd is a free download, works wherever Chrome Extensions do. For a similar strategy of blocking and controlling time-sink sites on Firefox, check out our guide to saving yourself with LeechBlock . StayFocusd [Google Chrome extension gallery via ReadWriteWeb ]
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gartner forecasts phones overtaking PCs as most common web browsing device by 2013

Predictions about phones overtaking PCs at one task or another are hardly anything new, but research firm Gartner has gotten a bit more specific than most with its latest forecast -- which, among other things, foretells of a day when cellphones will be the most common device used for browsing the web. That momentous event will supposedly happen by 2013, when Gartner expects the number of browser-equipped phones to exceed 1.83 billion, compared to 1.78 billion old fashioned computers in use. According to Gartner, however, while browser-equipped phones will outnumber PCs by then, they won't actually be most folks' primary browsing device until sometime in 2015. In other prognostication news, the firm also says that fully three billion of the world's population will be able to make electronic transactions via mobile or internet technology by 2014, and that by as soon as 2012, 20% of businesses will "own no IT assets" -- meaning that employees would be using their own personal computer, and that the businesses themselves would be relying on cloud-based services. Gartner forecasts phones overtaking PCs as most common web browsing device by 2013 originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:12:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Install PHProxy in Your Web Space to Access Blocked Sites [Downloads]

Got some web space you rent for a personal site? Good, then you can likely get around any restrictions your employer, school, or other eye-shielding authority have wrongly put in your way with a quick PHProxy installation. There are, of course, plenty of newer and more tech-savvy—and likely more private and secure—means of working your way around a web filter that seems unfair. PHProxy just happens to be one that is darned easy to install on any web space that can run PHP scripts, which these days is most of them. Grab the ZIP download from SourceForge, extract the folder inside, then copy it into a folder on YourPersonalSite.com, filling in your actual site name. Head to, for example, YourPersonalSite.com/phproxy, and you're greeted with a little address bar, and lots of data retention and privacy-enhancing options to determine what kind of traffic you'll generate when you head to your chosen site. Should you use this to look at very bad stuff that your boss would instantly fire you for glimpsing, should he discover your tracks? No, you should not, for many reasons. Can it be a quick little experiment in anonymizing your browsing records and getting past lockdown for the occasional sports score or Facebook check? You make the call. PHProxy is a free download, works on any hosted storage space (or home server ) that can run PHP scripts. Need to password protect your PHProxy directory so the whole world isn't trying to fit through your privacy gate? Try the previously mentioned Htaccess Editor , or try out Webmonkey's resources for htaccess editing . PHProxy [SourceForge via Wired How-To Wiki ]
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BlackBerry services down in North America yet again?

Look, BlackBerrys are always supposed to do a few things well: 1) grab your email in real time off an Exchange server; 2) make you look important; and 3) work . It seems, though, that we're working on our third major North American outage here in less than a month , with reports flowing in that users connected to BIS are having trouble with Messenger, web browsing, and apps that consume data (though email is inexplicably unaffected). Anyone out there seeing problems? [Thanks to everyone who sent this in] BlackBerry services down in North America yet again? originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:35:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Speed Dial Beefs Up Chrome’s New Tab Page [Downloads]

Chrome only: The oft-imitated New Tab button on Google's Chrome browser isn't bad, but it's not the most customizable either. Soup it up—and access your favorite bookmarked web sites quickly—with Speed Dial. Instead of keeping 4,000 tabs or windows open so you can revisit web sites quickly, just drop them into Speed Dial and keep them all accessible in a single click. The next time you open Speed Dial, all your favorite sites will be neatly lined up with a thumbnail preview of each page so you can tell what's what at a glance. That's all pretty similar to how the default New Tab page works, but Speed Dial expands on that in a few ways. This slick extension lets you choose how many favorite slots you want to have available, anywhere from three to 36. You can also customize the background color, theme, and whether you want the search box displayed on Speed Dial's main screen. Once installed, the extension places a small icon in the address bar of your browser. When you're visiting a page you want to add to Speed Dial, just click the icon and it will appear in your list. Note: Sometimes it takes a minute or two for changes to show up. Previously mentioned Speed Dial , Fast Dial , and various other Firefox extensions sport a lot of the same features, though the two don't appear to be related. (To give credit where due, we should also note that this whole interface originated with Opera's Speed Dial feature .) Will Speed Dial be on your list of must-have Chrome extensions, or are there other tweaks you prefer more? Let us know in the comments. Speed Dial [Chrome Extensions via Download Squad ]
Posted in Technology | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment